|
Current
Signal Transduction Therapy
ISSN: 1574-3624

Current Signal
Transduction Therapy
Volume 2, Number 2, May 2007
Contents

Targeting Neurotrophic Signal Transduction Pathways
in the Treatment of Mood Disorders Pp. 101-110
T.D. Gould and H.K. Manji
[Abstract]
Smad-Signaling in Mammary Gland Development and Tumorigenesis
Pp. 111-120
V. Gupta, A. Thiagalingam and S. Maheswaran
[Abstract]
Nitric Oxide: Friendly Rivalry in Tuberculosis
Pp. 121-128
S. Mukhopadhyay, S. Nair and S.E. Hasnain
[Abstract]
Potential Utilization of Bystander / Abscopal-Mediated
Signal Transduction Events in the Treatment of Solid Tumors
Pp. 129-143
M.E. Peters, M.M. Shareef, S. Gupta, M. Zagurovskaya-Sultanov,
M. Kadhim, M. Mohiuddin and M.M. Ahmed
[Abstract]
Mathematical Modeling of the Cancer Cell’s Control
Circuitry: Paving the Way to Individualized Therapeutic Strategies
Pp. 145-155
R.P. Araujo, E.F. Petricoin and L.A. Liotta
[Abstract]
Oncogene-Directed Therapies as Modulators of Cancer
Coagulopathy, Angiogenesis and Tumor-Vascular Interface
Pp. 157-163
J. Rak, C. Milsom, L. May and J. Yu
[Abstract]
Molecular Rationales for Signal Transduction Therapy
and Chemoprevention of BRCA1-Related Breast and Ovarian Tumours
Pp. 165-173
P. Tagliaferri, P. Tassone, A. Pietragalla, M.S. Rotundo,
V. Barbieri, A. Budillon, M. Caraglia, F.S. Costanzo and S.
Venuta
[Abstract]
Blocking Apoptotic Intracellular Signaling Cascades
with Cell Permeable Peptides Pp. 175-179
A. Zine, J. Beckmann and C. Bonny, A. Uziel
[Abstract]
Abstracts

[Back to top]
Targeting Neurotrophic Signal Transduction
Pathways in the Treatment of Mood Disorders
T.D. Gould and H.K. Manji
Mood disorders such as bipolar disorder and unipolar depression
are pervasive diseases associated with high rates of morbidity
and mortality. There exists an urgent need for novel medications.
Current compounds often do not bring about full remission,
and if they do, it is only after a minimum of many weeks,
if not months of treatment. Alterations in signaling pathways
represent a likely source of pathogenesis. Dynamic regulation
of complex signaling pathways plays a critical role in higher
order brain functions, which include the regulation of mood,
cognition, and sense of self and reality; thus implicating
their involvement in mood disorder pathophysiology and pathogenesis.
Impairments in neuroplasticity in the brains of patients suffering
from mood disorders suggest that novel medications designed
to attenuate impairments in these processes may have efficacy
in their treatment. Further, since the onset of the vast majority
of psychotrophic medications takes an extended period of treatment,
it is a widely held belief that these drugs may act by modulation
of critical neuronal signaling pathways and the resultant
changes in gene expression and protein function. Preclinical,
and some clinical, evidence implicates the action of specific
neurotrophic signaling pathways in the downstream mechanism
of action of medications useful for the treatment of mood
disorders. We discuss specific signaling pathway and molecular
treatment targets that are being considered for the development
of novel treatments for mood disorders.
[Back to top]
Smad-Signaling in Mammary Gland Development and Tumorigenesis
V. Gupta, A. Thiagalingam and S. Maheswaran
The Transforming Growth Factor-β
(TGFβ)
superfamily of cytokines regulates a myriad of cellular processes
including proliferation, differentiation and tumorigenesis.
Signaling by these growth regulatory molecules is propagated
by ligand-induced hetero-oligomerization of distinct type
II and type I serine/threonine kinase receptors, which result
in activation of receptor-activated Smad proteins as well
as Smad-independent pathways. Disruption of TGFβ
induced signaling can contribute to development and progression
of human breast cancer. The role of Smad-signaling in mammary
gland development and tumorigenesis will be the focus of this
review.
[Back to top]
Nitric Oxide: Friendly Rivalry in Tuberculosis
S. Mukhopadhyay, S. Nair and S.E. Hasnain
Immune dependent growth and development of infectious agents
and pathogenesis are increasingly being recognized as crucial
for designing efficient immunotherapeutic approaches for Mycobacterium
tuberculosis. Nitric oxide (NO) in the context of mycobacterial
infection is an essential component of the protective armory
of host innate immune system. However, the ability of NO to
suppress host immune response questions the traditional view
that production of NO is actually designed for anti-microbial
mechanism. Human tuberculosis is considered as a prime example
of a disease controlled dominantly by cell-mediated and not
by humoral immunity. Interleukins like IL-12 and IL-8 play
important roles in anti-tuberculosis immunity. While IL-8
has a central role in leukocyte recruitment to areas of granuloma
formation, IL-12 helps in the generation of effective cell-mediated
immune response in tuberculosis. NO shows an ability to inhibit
mycobacterial infection by inducing innate-cytotoxic response
and by increasing IL-8 induction. However, it may become a
problem in later phase when it converts a protective Th1 response
to a subversive Th2 response mainly by inhibiting IL-12 cytokine,
thus acting as a potential regulator of Th1/Th2 response.
This review intends to explore the possibilities that can
be envisioned for exploring NO from immunotherapeutic perspectives
in mycobacterial immunity.
[Back to top]
Potential Utilization of Bystander / Abscopal-Mediated
Signal Transduction Events in the Treatment of Solid Tumors
M.E. Peters, M.M. Shareef, S. Gupta, M. Zagurovskaya-Sultanov,
M. Kadhim, M. Mohiuddin and M.M. Ahmed
A transformed cell among a group of normal cells exerts a
dynamic influence for clonal growth and mass transformation.
Likewise, a treatment-induced damaged cell might exert deleterious
signal to either neighboring or distal cells. These signals
that elicit either transformation or cell death are classified
under two independent phenomena. These two phenomena are called
(1) Abscopal effect and (2) Bystander effect. There are several
agents that have been reported to induce abscopal and bystander
effects. Ionizing radiation and ultraviolet radiation are
prime inducers of abscopal and bystander effects. In addition,
localized therapies for tumor control such as gene therapy
approaches, prodrug conversion based chemotherapy approaches,
and surgical procedures are significant inducers of either
abscopal or bystander effects. The proposed mechanisms that
have been reported in literature clearly indicate pivotal
roles of cytokine and ceramide signaling leading to the activation
of pro-survival proteins and/or pro-apoptotic proteins. Together
these pathways provide distinct differences between abscopal
and bystander effects that are of particular interest in modern
cancer therapeutics. The most exciting future direction of
bystander/ abscopal biology in terms of cancer therapeutics
will potentially arise from the use of stem cells. In this
review, a critical evaluation of potential benefits of abscopal
/ bystander effects mediated signaling pathways in relation
to cancer therapeutics are discussed in detail.
[Back to top]
Mathematical Modeling of the Cancer Cell’s Control
Circuitry: Paving the Way to Individualized Therapeutic Strategies
R.P. Araujo, E.F. Petricoin and L.A. Liotta
Cancer is a disease of signal transduction in which the dysregulation
of the network of intracellular and extracellular signaling
cascades is sufficient to thwart the cell’s finely-tuned
biochemical control mechanisms. A keen interest in the mathematical
modeling of cell signaling networks and the regulation of
signal transduction has emerged in recent years, and has produced
a glimmer of insight into the sophisticated feedback control
and network regulation operating within cells. In this review,
we present an overview of published theoretical studies on
the control aspects of signal transduction, emphasizing the
role and importance of mechanisms such as ‘ultrasensitivity’
and feedback loops. We emphasize that these exquisite and
often subtle control strategies represent the key to orchestrating
‘simple’ signaling behaviors within the complex
intracellular network, while regulating the trade-off between
sensitivity and robustness to internal and external perturbations.
Through a consideration of these apparent paradoxes, we explore
how the basic homeostasis of the intracellular signaling network,
in the face of carcinogenesis, can lead to neoplastic progression
rather than cell death. A simple mathematical model is presented,
furnishing a vivid illustration of how ‘control-oriented’
models of the deranged signaling networks in cancer cells
may enucleate improved treatment strategies, including patient-tailored
combination therapies, with the potential for reduced toxicity
and more robust and potent antitumor activity.
[Back to top]
Oncogene-Directed Therapies as Modulators of Cancer
Coagulopathy, Angiogenesis and Tumor-Vascular Interface
J. Rak, C. Milsom, L. May and J. Yu
Oncogenic lesions in the cancer cell genome not only alter
the intrinsic properties of cancer cells themselves, but also
trigger signaling events, the effects of which impact the
relationship between tumors and their surrounding host tissues,
including the vascular system. Manifestations of the latter
include the onset and progression of tumor angiogenesis, and
systemic activation of the hemostatic system, a process also
known as cancer coagulopathy, or Trousseau syndrome. Indeed,
tumor growth, invasion and metastasis are profoundly affected
by the properties of the tumor - vascular interface. We postulated
earlier that the link between the expression of cancer-causing
signaling alterations and cancer coagulopathy is at least
twofold. First, cancer coagulopathy may emerge indirectly,
as an unspecific consequence of vascular permeability and
other features of tumor-associated vascular growth, including
the pro- and anticoagulant actions of certain angiogenic mediators,
some of which (e.g. VEGF) are direct regulatory targets of
oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Second, activated oncogenes
(K-ras, EGFR or PML-RARα,
MET), and/or inactivation of tumor suppressors (e.g. p53 or
PTEN) may de-regulate some of the hemostatic proteins more
directly, i.e. through changes in expression of tissue
factor (TF), plasminogen activation inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) and
cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) [1-4]. In addition to TF expression
and release as plasma microvesieles, mutant K-ras
may also upregulate expression of thrombin receptors (PAR-1)
by cancer cells, thereby possibly rendering such cells hypersensitive
to signals emanating from the hemostatic system (e.g. pericellular
thrombin). Here, we present an argument that anti-cancer signal
transduction inhibitors, also known as 'targeted agents' (e.g.
Gleevec, Iressa, Erbitux, ATRA) could modulate various vascular
processes in cancer, including angiogenesis and cancer coagulopathy,
i.e. act as cancer - specific indirect antiangiogenic agents,
possibly with a distinct element of anticoagulant activity.
[Back to top]
Molecular Rationales for Signal Transduction Therapy
and Chemoprevention of BRCA1-Related Breast and Ovarian Tumours
P. Tagliaferri, P. Tassone, A. Pietragalla, M.S. Rotundo,
V. Barbieri, A. Budillon, M. Caraglia, F.S. Costanzo and S.
Venuta
The design of novel therapeutic strategies based on tumour
molecular features and specific carcinogenetic pathways is
a compelling issue. Tumours arising in BRCA1-defective individual
carriers constitute a specific entity which resembles the
basal-like molecular phenotype for breast tumours, while BRCA1-defective
ovarian cancer has a molecular signature which is also shared
by a substantial amount of sporadic tumours. Several important
issues are derived from the role of BRCA1 gene product in
critical cell functions like DNA repair, transcription regulation
and cell cycle checkpoint control. It has been recently demonstrated
that the loss of such functions in BRCA1-defective tumours
results in a specific profile of sensitivity to anti-cancer
drugs. Moreover, BRCA1 appears to retain a critical role in
the response of cells to stress as well as to the growth promoting
stimuli generated by estrogens and peptide growth factors.
Therefore, it is conceivable that loss of a functional BRCA1
produces a general de-arrangement of cellular signaling which
might allow the identification of specific and high priority
targets and lead to individualized signal transduction-based
anti-tumour approaches. We will review the most important
findings related to BRCA1 effects on cellular signaling in
order to depict a general scenario for selective chemopreventive
and therapeutic strategies.
[Back to top]
Blocking Apoptotic Intracellular Signaling Cascades
with Cell Permeable Peptides
A. Zine, J. Beckmann and C. Bonny, A. Uziel
Cells are continuously adapting to changes in their environment
by activating extracellular stimuli-dependent signal transduction
cascades. These cascades, or signaling pathways, culminate
both in changes in genes expression and in the functional
regulation of pre-existing proteins. The Mitogen-Activated
Protein Kinases (MAPKs) constitute a structurally related
class of signaling proteins whose distinctive feature is their
ability to directly phosphorylate, and thereby modulate, the
activity of the transcription factors that are targets of
the initial stimuli. The specificity of activation of MAPK
signaling modules is determined, at least for an important
part, by the specificity of the protein-protein contacts that
are required for the propagation of the signal. We will discuss
how it is possible to interfere with MAPK signaling by using
short cell-permeable peptides able to block, through a competitive
mechanisms, relevant protein-protein contacts, and their effects
on signaling and cell function.
|